Discussion Group Mini-Essays (=MEs) and Classmate Responses (=CRs)
You will be assigned to a Polylearn
discussion group of 6-8 students. In your
group's Discussion Forum, you will post most of your "lower-stakes"
writing assignments. These ungraded
assignments include five mini-essays (=MEs),
one on each play, and ten Classmate Responses (=CRs)
offering feedback to the MEs posted by two of your
fellow Discussion Group members.
While ungraded, MEs and CRs
are scaffolded writing
assignments designed to prepare you to do well on higher-stakes,
graded writing assignments (a 3- to 4- page expanded and
revised Essay and the essay components of the Midterm and Final
Exams).
Additionally, because your posted MEs and CRs put you in dialogue with other members of your Discussion Group, completion of these ungraded assignments counts toward the 20% of your course grade based upon participation, intellectual engagement, and collaboration, and they are required for you to get credit for your 3-4 page graded Paper.
Write your MEs using the ME
Template provided on Polylearn to ensure proper
formatting (and to consult the additional ME tips and pointers
included on this template).
Mini-Essays
are due to your assigned Discussion Forum no later than
midnight on the days indicated on the course calendar.
(typically, Friday of weeks 2, 4, 7, 8 and 9).
Start a new "thread" for each Mini-Essay. The SUBJECT LINE for a Mini-Essay posting should begin with the ME number followed by a colon and the title of your ME, which should make clear what work and topic you are writing about.
CRs are due to your assigned Discussion Forum no later than midnight on the days indicated on the course calendar (typically the Sunday following the ME due date). To submit a Classmate Response, hit the "reply" key from within the text of the ME posting to which you are responding so that your response forms a thread directly linked to the ME of your classmate. (Do NOT start a new discussion thread when submitting a Classmate Response.)
MEs are primarily intended to do two things: get you to engage critically with a one of Shakespeare's plays, and give you an opportunity to practice analytic writing skills through lower-stakes (ungraded) writing that will help prepare you to do well on the higher-stakes (and graded) assignments: the essay sections on exams (together worth approximately 25% of the course grade) and the 3-4 page expanded and revised Essay that counts for 15% of the final course grade. Don't try to dazzle me with something new and original. Aim instead to demonstrate your grasp of significant issues pointed to in the Study Guides and covered in our class meetings. Once you have determined your focus, concentrate on articulating your specific claims clearly and explicitly in your opening paragraph and constructing a strong logical argument based upon close reading (analysis of specific passages in the text) to support those claims. Your paper should demonstrate your ability to
Use the ME Template available on Polylearn to ensure that your ME is correctly formatted. Note that this template also includes additional tips and pointers to help you write a strong ME!
Your mini-essay (=ME) should
consist of an introductory paragraph which explicitly
articulates your claims (it is not enough
simply to identify the topic you will
explore; tell us what specific claims
you will make about that topic)); 2-4 body
paragraphs of argumentation based on close reading,
i.e. the analysis of lines quoted from the play
(aim for 2-4 quotations incorporated into each body paragraph);
and a conclusion summing up the argument and, if you
wish, offering a final insight that points to issues beyond the
scope of the ME (i.e. connecting the focus of the ME to larger
issues in the work, making connections to other readings, or
speculating about Shakespeare's intentions or how the play may
have been received by its original audience).
Your ME must offer analysis
of specific passages (close reading) rather than
simply explaining what happens in a play (plot summary). A good ME should engage
Shakespeare's text in a way that demonstrates you
have thought about the study
questions, read the text carefully, and paid attention
during class discussion.
Citations from the play should be documented parenthetically immediately following the citation, using act, scene and inclusive line numbers, separated by periods. You may use either roman or arabic numerals for act and scene numbers; use only arabic numerals for the inclusive line numbers of the text you have quoted (e.g. MND 1.2.1-10 or MND I.ii.1-10 are both acceptable ways to indicate "Act 1, Scene 2, lines 1-10").
Do NOT quote secondary sources
(e.g. text introductions, footnotes, or online readings).
The information they contain is now "yours," and for the purpose
of these assignments, you can mention it as relevant to your
argument without specific documentation.
MEs should adhere to
the two-page target length.
(so that you have room to revise and expand the ungraded ME of
your choice into the 3-4-page graded essay). They should
be focused, well organized, written in grammatically correct, formal
prose (no sentence fragments; no slang; watch punctuation
and word choice!), and supported by well-chosen textual
evidence (i.e. you must CITE SHAKESPEARE'S PLAY
to back up your claims in every body paragraph). Document
your textual support with page numbers (or LINE NUMBERS if the
text has individually numbered lines) in parentheses immediately
following the quotation. Include a Work Cited at the end
of the ME.
ME SUBMISSION: PLEASE FOLLOW THESE INSTRUCTIONS
CAREFULLY!!
CLASSMATE RESPONSE GUIDELINES:
By midnight on the dates indicated on the Calendar of Assignments (typically, Sundays for MEs posted on Fridays), you must read the MEs posted by the other members of your discussion group and post Classmate Responses (=CRs) to two of them. Your CRs should be at least one thoughtful and substantive paragraph in length (no less than 100 words). Because a CR is intended to open a substantive conversation with your classmate, begin by addressing the author by name. Your CRs should either build upon or offer a counter argument to the ME you are responding to; be sure that you address both your classmate's ideas and the Shakespeare's text, WHICH YOU SHOULD QUOTE AT LEAST ONCE, using a citation which was NOT included in the ME to which you are responding. You must post two CRs in order to receive credit for each of your MEs.
For your CRs, choose the MEs you feel you can respond to most substantively and fruitfully. As a rule, you should choose the MEs which you find strongest / most interesting -- but you may also respond to an ME with which you disagree, provided that you do so RESPECTFULLY and that you back up your assertions with textual support.
The best CRs are neither mean-spirited nor lazy ("I agree with everything you said") -- it's not about criticizing your classmate's ideas, nor is it about praising them. The best CRs build on your classmate's ideas or offer another way of understanding the the play. Be sure that you address BOTH your classmate's ideas AND your own thoughts about the text (which you should cite at least once, choosing a citation that was NOT quoted by your classmate in the ME to which you are responding).
Like your 5 ungraded MEs, your
10 ungraded CRs are "lower-stakes" writing that
are not individually graded but factor into the 20% participation,
intellectual engagement, and collaboration component
of your final course grade. But while they are not
individually graded, please take them seriously. MEs and
CRs are "scaffolded"
writing assignments designed to prepare you to do well on the higher-stakes, graded
writing that counts for 40% of your final course
grade (15% for the 3- to 4-page paper that
is a revision and expansion of one ME; one half of exam points
for the essay component of the Midterm and Final Exams,
which together count for 25% of the final course grade).